Can African Banks Compete With Fintech Infrastructure Players in Cross-Border Payments?

Cross-Border Payments

African banks are narrowing the gap with fintech infrastructure providers in cross-border payments, as new continental settlement rails and pricing reforms begin to chip away at long-standing cost disadvantages.

For years, technology-led firms built their edge on speed, transparency and lean foreign-exchange pricing, while banks relied on correspondent networks that routed African payments through hubs in Europe and the U.S. By March 2026, that divide is less pronounced. Banks are adopting a hybrid model that combines partnerships with infrastructure upgrades, shifting competition from direct displacement to coexistence inside an interconnected ecosystem.

Continental Rails Change the Equation

A central pillar of this shift is the Pan-African Payment and Settlement System (PAPSS), which enables cross-border transfers in local currencies without passing through hard currencies such as the dollar or euro.

On February 2026, Kenya’s Pesalink became a technical connectivity provider to PAPSS, opening instant, 24/7 cross-border transfers to more than 80 Kenyan financial institutions, including banks, Saccos and telecommunications operators. The link allows participants to settle transactions across Africa within seconds, bypassing correspondent banks that traditionally added both time and cost.

Regional systems are also tightening. In Southern Africa, the South African Reserve Bank operates the SADC-RTGS for high-value payments, while the Transactions Cleared on an Immediate Basis scheme is expanding instant retail corridors between countries such as Botswana, Eswatini and Zimbabwe. In East Africa, the East African Payment System connects central banks in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania, and was complemented in February 2026 by the East African Community Cross-Border Payment System Masterplan, which prioritizes instant retail settlement for MSMEs and digital trade.

In the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa bloc, the COMESA Regional Payment and Settlement System (REPSS) continues to process transfers in dollars and euros across eight countries, with work underway to interface directly with PAPSS to create a single continental corridor.

Internalising Fintech Capabilities

Some banks are going further by acquiring technology outright. Kenya’s KCB Group has taken stakes in Riverbank Solutions and Pesapal, embedding payment orchestration and merchant tools within its structure. The strategy allows banks to offer API-driven services similar to fintech infrastructure players, while keeping settlement and compliance in-house.

At the messaging layer, the adoption of ISO 20022 is reducing another historical weakness. By November 2026, new CBPR+ requirements will mandate structured address formats and richer data fields for cross-border transactions. Banks that previously struggled with manual reconciliation are now able to transmit detailed remittance information, lowering exception rates and narrowing the operational advantage fintech firms once held.

The FX Margin Gap

Pricing remains the sharpest dividing line.

Foreign-exchange spreads, the difference between the interbank rate and the rate offered to customers, function as a de facto surcharge. Traditional banks typically apply margins of 2% to 3% on major currency pairs, with thinner corridors reaching 5% to 10%. For a small business transferring $10,000, that spread alone can cost between $200 and $300.

Fintech platforms, by contrast, generally operate on margins of 0.3% to 1%, often separating the FX charge from the transfer fee in transparent pricing schedules. Digital-only money transfer operators serving African SMEs average total costs of about 3.55%, compared with 7.4% to 12% for bank wires.

Globally routed correspondent transfers remain among the most expensive, with some corridors reaching 11.48% to 14.55% of transaction value once compliance, processing and lifting fees are included. Settlement can take three to seven business days.

Banks integrating PAPSS and national switches are beginning to close that gap. By settling in local currencies and eliminating double conversion into dollars or euros, institutions on the Pesalink network are reducing regional payment costs that previously averaged 7% to 8%. Policymakers estimate that broader local-currency settlement could save the continent about $5 billion annually in transaction and FX leakages.

Total annual revenue from FX fees in African cross-border payments is projected to decline toward $18 billion as competition and pricing transparency increase.

Stablecoins and Digital Alternatives

Fintech challengers are not standing still. Stablecoins account for about 43% of crypto transaction volume in Sub-Saharan Africa, frequently used as an alternative settlement rail to bypass traditional corridors where fees can exceed 15%. By converting local currency into dollar-pegged tokens, transferring on blockchain networks and reconverting at destination, users can avoid multiple intermediary banks.

For regulators and central banks, the growth of digital-asset rails adds urgency to domestic reforms. Faster, cheaper bank-led systems reduce incentives for corporates and SMEs to migrate toward unregulated channels.

From Displacement to Coexistence

The competitive landscape in 2026 is less about banks versus fintechs and more about who controls the rails and pricing structure. Fintech infrastructure firms still maintain an edge in lean FX spreads and user experience. Banks retain advantages in balance-sheet strength, regulatory trust and access to national switches.

As continental systems such as PAPSS interlink with regional RTGS platforms and national instant-payment switches, banks are reducing dependence on third-party correspondent networks. Whether they can fully match fintech pricing will depend on how aggressively they compress FX margins, a step that directly affects one of their most durable revenue streams.

For African corporates and SMEs, the outcome is already visible in faster settlement times, lower conversion costs and more corridor options. The question for 2026 is no longer whether banks can compete, but how much of the shrinking fee pool they are willing to give up to stay in the race.

Jefferson Wachira is a writer at Africa Digest News, specializing in banking and finance trends, and their impact on African economies.